[Cob] psi testing
Damon Howell
dhowell at pickensprogress.com
Thu Sep 23 11:05:46 CDT 2010
Or you could do like most cobbers have done for the past 20 years and
just build your home and not get into all that bureaucracy. Because
as surely everyone on this list knows and you point out, it's more
about lining lobbyist's pockets that building good, cheap, and safe
homes. I mean, c'mon, as Ed was saying the requirement for strength
of your walls is 1200% overkill. They know natural materials cannot
deliver like concrete and steel, that's why the requirement is in
place. It's taken me forever and I'm only half way finished, but I'm
building a storage building which I plan to use as a demo, because as
I've noticed with visitors, people are weary of cob's legitimacy
until they can see and touch it themselves. Then they see the system
that's trying to suppress cob is acting on ill grudges against being
labeled too traditional and poor.
Damon in GA
I have followed these threads about psi testing and I am thankful
that the information is out there, regardless of what regulating
bodies demand certain data and what not.If cob is to be recognized as
a legitimate building method it will take people like you, Janet, to
do the legwork to get it done. Kudos.While building code may be
slanted in many ways towards lobbyist groups (vinyl, lumber, etc), it
is absolutely necessary to go through the bureaucratic process to
get cob recognized and legitimized.Once architects and engineers can
sign off on this invaluable building method based upon some proven
data, the better off we all will be.Why hinder the process? Why not
support cob building? No matter what avenue?