Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] fly ash in cob or plaster (was fly ash in foundation)Barbara Roemer roemiller4 at gmail.comSun Oct 5 17:14:42 CDT 2008
This section from wiki entry on fly ash may be pertinent. If it does tend to pop out, wouldn't make a good additive for plaster, though could still be used in cob.... Also, see another section from the same query on fly ash, but scan down for heavy metal info which I've pasted in below the bricks entry. Seems that binding up the fly ash in concrete or perhaps cob would be a better use than that as a plaster in an inhabited structure. Barbara Bricks Ash bricks have been used in house construction in Windhoek, Namibia<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windhoek>since the 1970's. There is, however, a problem with the bricks in that they tend to fail or produce unsightly pop-outs. This happens when the bricks come into contact with moisture and a chemical reaction occurs causing the bricks to expand. In May 2007, Henry Liu<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liu_%28civil_engineer%29>, a retired 70-year old American civil engineer<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_engineer>, announced that he had invented a new, environmentally sound building brick<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick>composed of fly ash and water. Compressed at 4,000 psi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pounds_per_square_inch> and cured for 24 hours in a 150 °F (66 °C) steam bath , then toughened with an air entrainment <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_entrainment> agent, the bricks last for more than 100 freeze-thaw cycles. Owing to the high concentration of calcium oxide <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_oxide> in class C fly ash, the brick can be described as "self-cementing". The manufacturing method is said to save energy, reduce mercury<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_%28element%29>pollution, and costs 20% less than traditional clay brick manufacturing. Liu intends to license his technology to manufacturers in 2008.[12]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-11> [13 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-12> Environmental Problems Fly ash, like soil, contains trace concentrations of many heavy metals<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metals>that are known to be detrimental to health in sufficient quantities. These include nickel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel>, vanadium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium>, arsenic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenic>, beryllium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beryllium>, cadmium <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium>, barium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barium>, chromium <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium>, copper<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper>, molybdenum <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum>, zinc<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc>, lead <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead>, selenium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium>, uranium <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium>, thorium<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium>, and radium <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium>. Though these elements are found in extremely low concentrations in fly ash, their mere presence has prompted some to sound alarm. The U.S. EPA <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPA> has said in the past that coal fly ash does not need to be regulated as a hazardous waste.[15]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-14>However, a revised risk assessment may change the way CCW is regulated [16] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-15> Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USGS> and others conclude that fly ash compares with common soils or rocks and should not be the source of alarm.[17] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-16> [edit<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fly_ash&action=edit§ion=16> ] Contamination in Byker In the 1980s and 1990s, around 2,000 tons of fly ash from local incinerators were used by the local council deliberately to surface footpaths around the Byker <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byker> and Walker<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker,_Newcastle_upon_Tyne>districts of Newcastle upon Tyne <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_upon_Tyne>, England.[18]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-CAT-17>Considerable concern was raised in the local community when this was discovered. Later studies found contamination by dioxins and furans from this fly ash, although no strong evidence for heavy metals (the area has an industrial past that may explain the leves that were found).[19]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash#cite_note-U._NCL.2C_Byker-18>
|