Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] cob or concrete: hydrophobic vs hydrophillic considerationsOcean Liff-Anderson ocean at woodfiredeatery.comMon Aug 18 19:48:23 CDT 2008
OK, I sure caused a bit of a storm by suggesting we talk to the concrete professionals, who we all know would laugh their a**es off at the suggestion to add a degradable material to concrete. My off the cuff response is due to my frustration with the coblist - there have been many speculative suggestions of relatively serious or silly nature, which may or may not have severe consequences to the inhabitants of the buildings proposed. Let's not forget the poor fellow killed when his cob dome collapsed on him due to failure of the straw by water damage. I really suggested the concrete professionals because the original poster seemed to want to use the material they would know so much about - Portland cement. Just because this is an "alternative" list doesn't mean we should shirk the expertise of the conventional building industry, especially when suggesting to merge an industrial material with a degradable material - straw. Another consideration about the concrete-straw hybrid which I didn't mention: Hydrophilic vs. Hydrophobic characteristics of cement vs. clay: As mentioned by Damon (and countless cob professionals including Ianto Evans), in a dry cob wall straw can last hundreds or thousands of years. This is due to the chemical nature of clay, which is hydrophobic under proper conditions - namely no surface source of water, plenty of air circulation - clay dries completely, protecting the straw that cob depends upon for shear strength. Ianto also speculates that rain blown onto the surface of an un-plastered wall will not penetrate further than a few fractions of an inch because the surface clay hydrates and expands, in a sense creating a barrier to prevent rain from penetrating deeper into the wall, where it might soak the straw and cause it to fail. Portland cement, on the other hand, is highly hydrophilic, meaning it holds onto water, and actuallys wick water from a below ground source - why most cobbers will not use concrete as a footing for a cob building. The straw in the cob immediately adjacent to the concrete footing can rot due to water wicked through the concrete. I would speculate that rain blown onto a concrete-straw wall would be wicked into the wall, ultimately causing the straw to degrade and the wall to fail. Additionally there is the damage done chemically by the caustic cement during the initial wet concrete phase (which doesn't happen in cob - clay isn't caustic, wet or dry). Given these concerns, I wouldn't trust straw mixed into concrete for shear strength. One last point: I don't think I ever said that "all cement is bad". I have in fact used a lot of cement, learned a great deal about it from the professionals who have helped by projects, including Kiko Denzer. I've also seen cob get soaked at the concrete footing / cob interface, due to the wicking nature of the concrete. I speculate that the wall may eventually fail in this case. On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:12 PM, Lance Collins wrote: > In my response to Ocean's comments I was reacting to his 'all cement > is bad' tone and saying things about concrete which conflict with my > experiences. > > I believe in using appropriate technology. Concrete is a very good > technology and the fact that some people get the design and building > of their structures wrong does not support arguments against concrete. > > The principal problem with concrete is it's environmental impact > (which is one of the reasons this list exists). > > Straw might work as a concrete re-inforcement but to me it doesn't > seem worth the bother. Once you have paid for your concrete for only > a little extra you can get some steel and also great confidence that > the steel and concrete will work together to give you a > satisfactory result. > > For people building their own dwelling probably the only place where > concrete might be considered is for foundations or retaining walls > where ground water is a problem. > > Lance > (in Aus) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Coblist mailing list > Coblist at deatech.com > http://www.deatech.com/mailman/listinfo/coblist
|