Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] Radiant floors - why not cob???ocean ocean at woodfiredeatery.comMon Jan 29 14:01:03 CST 2007
After I finished my last post, I just realized I am concerened about the "off topic" subject of this whole thread (which I posted with an off topic answer): Why aren't we discussing cob-floor radiant systems instead of concrete? PEX (which I just posted about) is ideal under cob, as well as concrete. You can even used the 6x6 wire mesh to zip-tie the PEX to. And cob is neutral and non-reactive, if you decided to used copper. So a plea to get back on topic - let's discuss cob floor systems. I doubt anyone investing in the eco-friendly lifestyle of cob construction would really want to live with a concrete slab under their feet. Especially considering the fact that medical waste is often used to fire Portland cement kilns resulting in embedded radioactive isotopes in your slab... One of the side benefits to a cob floor is that if for some reason your water system springs a leak (very unlikely) - cob is much easier to excavate and reinstall than a concrete slab - you don't need a jack hammer! Just a flat shovel, mattock, wheelbarrow to demo a cob floor. One warning - Breitenbush has a little cob meditation hut called Budda's Playhouse, with a geothermal system in the earthen floor. However, they must have used turpentine & linseed in the finish, and YEARS later the system still stinks of solvent! Very important to work out this detail, since the heated cob will outgas any solvent more than an unheated cob floor. (Any thoughts on this Charmaine?) And another concern, regarding the possible embedded clay pipe flue in the floor - if there are any leaks (ever so small) you might be subjecting your living space to carbon monoxide poisoning... On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:48 AM, joe r dupont wrote: > WRAP THE COPPER PIPE WITH PE FILM.. > I THINK THE FAILURES ARE MORE FROM ABRASION CAUSED BY EXPANSION AND > CONTRACTION OF THE COPPER RATHER THAN THE CHEMICAL ASPECT OF IT. IF > THE CONCRETE IS DRY.. REALLY DRY THAT WOULD BE MINIMAL.
|