Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] building small - (was: long response to some of Jill'squestions)Ric Allan ric at mx5.netMon Oct 27 20:07:32 CST 2003
----- Original Message ----- From: "Everhart, Gabe" <geverhart at hjhigh.com> To: <coblist at deatech.com> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: [Cob] building small - (was: long response to some of Jill'squestions) Although I agree a person should build as small as they can stand it. 5000 SF mini-mansions are an abomination - should be a law against them. What conceivable justification could you place on such a law. Larer homes COULD be needed with an extended family arrangement. A family homestead with several generations... or it could be a couple with an extended non-human family... whatever the case, this IS a philosophical argument you're putting forth. But WHY build small? What is the purpose? Is it to increase population density, and therefore better utilize available resources, like in an urban setting? Then why do so many cobbers live on like 5 acres of land out in the woods (besides code issues)? Doesn' t that just increase sprawl, and require them to drive that much more, increasing overall polution? Basically, density overloads the natural environment. People spread over larger areas (lower density) MAKES sense alleviating the need for sewers and water systems... lessening the impact to the land. I like the idea of living in a small space because: 1) less use of material and resources (including land, our most non-renewable resource) 2) less power consumption for conditioning of space 3) less housework and 4) ultimately it leads to both lower upfront cost AND lifetime operational cost - although that's just a fringe benefit, not the main thing. Point two and four are a factor of design more than size. Point one is deceptive because the larger the plots, the less that can be made on them (more is locked away from others)... In my mind, any other objection to a "large" living space vs. a "small" living space (both very subjective terms) is strickly philosophical. And although I like hearing other people's philosphies, at the end of the day it's got nuttin to do wit' the price o' beans. Yup! _______________________________________________ Coblist mailing list Coblist at deatech.com http://www.deatech.com/mailman/listinfo/coblist
|