Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Fw: Cob: Seismic EffectsJohn Gorman johnwgorman at yahoo.comFri Mar 2 15:25:05 CST 2001
> Hi John Fordice and fellow cobbers, > > I would very much like to see you re-post the information about > strengthening cob structures. I have not yet build my cob "dream" but > honestly have reservations about going to bed with my head a foot away from > a cob wall then being jolted awake by a 7, 8, or 9 magnitude earthquake. A > cob wall falling on me or my family is a horrifying thought. Even though cob > is my preferred building material, because of it's eco-advantages and > affordability, I will turn to straw bale, tires or another innovative plan > if I can't be convinced that my home won't crumble as those that have > recently in El Salvador and India (I don't know how many crumbled buildings > were earthen structures but understand that many adobe structures in ES were > destroyed.) > > It seems logical (no scientific basis) that compressing a beam to the top of > cob walls which is bolted to vertical steel or wooden supports embedded in > the cob and fastened to the foundation would help keep the wall together in > the up-and-down "wave" motion of a quake and may help in side-to-side > "whipping" movement as well. I have seen postings that refute this, > however. I have also imagined running rebar through the walls, tied into a > concrete or stone foundation. Of course these measures detract from some of > the main benefits of cob...simplicity and reliance on local, earth-friendly > materials. > > JG > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Fordice" <otherfish at home.com> > To: "John Gorman" <johnwgorman at yahoo.com> > Cc: <coblist at deatech.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:02 PM > Subject: Re: Cob: Seismic Effects > > > > To John G. & all cobbers, > > The seismic event in Washington yesterday points out the need to take > > earthquakes seriously, no matter where you are, when you build with cob. > > Western Oregon, Washington & B.C. all fall into the Uniform Building > > Code classification of Earthquake Zone 3. While this is not as severe > > as the Zone 4 classification in California, it is still a high risk > > zone. For other areas of a less sever classification, the risk is still > > there in that there may be unknown faults which could be the source > > otherwise unexpected earthquakes. When it comes to building with a > > heavy and non flexible material like earth, it is best ( in my opinion ) > > to be safe rather than sorry. An earthquake is potentially possible no > > matter where you build on the planet. So don't mess around - build > > safe. Pushing the envelope is fine, but do it in a way that won't kill > > you or somebody else who just happens to be in your building. > > > > I'm hopeful that John's query brings info to the list that helps us to > > see that cob in Western North America has shown itself to indeed be > > earthquake safe & how this was attained. > > > > For anyone who is interested, I posted to the list recently about this & > > how it is relatively easy to include earthquake stability elements in > > your cob building. This can be found in the Archive or I'll repost it if > requested. > > > > cob on > > john fordice > > maker of cobbers thumbs > > TCCP > > > > > John Gorman wrote: > > > > > > Are there any owners/caretakers of cob structures in the Pacific > > > Northwest that can speak to how the buildings survived the temblor > > > yesterday? I am especially interested in knowing about buildings in > > > the Seattle/Olympia area, which was near the epicenter. Also, if you > > > could speak about the foundation type and any structural strengthening > > > aspects your building may have that would give a more complete > > > picture. > > > Thanx > > > John, > > > Portland, OR > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|