Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob Re: Carpet/cement per PatStephen H. Kapit shaman at dreamtime.netFri Jul 3 13:17:53 CDT 1998
Thanks Don, that was very useful information. Stephen Don Stephens wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Patrick Newberry wrote: You mentioned Earth - not so > > good sandwiched between the layers of cement/carpet, Yet latter on you > > mention the wonderful aspects of a living roof (I too have a high > > opinion of) But then why is a living roof good and earth between two > > layers not good? I have thought of putting living roof on top of this > > but at this point I'm still leaning toward the sandwich roof. > > Also on the shed style roof, it will probably not be "flat" like a > > sheet of plywood. Last time I used this method, the carpet dipped > > between by 2x4 supports due to the cement carpet drooping between > > supports. My brain told me (but it's been wrong before) that hey > > this is better because it's more like the corregated roof (right > > word?) anyway I did't fight the wavy-ness by pulling real tight > > between the support. > > I'll will go ahead and start making some "test" sandwiches. > > One test we did ealier here was using peanut shells and a small > > amount of cement.. Being in Geogia (not too far from Jimmy's place) I > > have access to as many peanut shells as I want for free. We mixed > > them with cement and made inch and a half thick squares. I stood > > gently on it (about 150 lbs) and it held. My son stood on it and it > > broke (about 250 lbs) I have thought this might be an interesting > > middle layer for the roof as the weight of the squares as much less > > than a cement square would be. ...Pat, Mauk GA > > > > > > Earth - not so good. Earth is wonderful stuff and super in cob, rammed > > > earth, stucco, floors, thermal storage, growing stuff on your roof, > > > buffering short-term temerature fluctuations, etc., but as INSULATION, > > > it's heavy and only about R-.2 per inch (dry), eg.: a foot of earth is > > > less insulating than 1" of straw (~R-3). Weight of a cubic foot of dry > > > earth ~ 120# dry - Weight of a square foot of compressed straw 1" deep " ~ > > > 8 ounces! heavy = more structure = more effort and or expense! > > > PS: Are you receptive to the idea of a "living Roof" surface on top? > > > That's one of the techniques of which I'm particularly fond and one I've > > > been experimenting with since the 60s. It's ecofriendly, cheap, gives an > > > almost eternal life to the waterproofing membrane underneath (no UV, no > > > freeze and thaw cycle, no dry and wet yoyo, no physical trama from foot > > > traffic or falling branches), manages run-off better and it's "purty". > > The common confusion with earth is between INSULATION and MODERATION. as > I indicated above, earth has a very poor ability to insulate - prevent the > transfer (escape/intrusion) of heat. On the other hand it has a high mass > which very effectively moderates temperatures - it takes a lot of heat to > warm it up, a lot of cold to cool it down. This means if your day > temperature is ~ 20 F. but it drops to - 10 F. overnight, the soil surface > in the morning will have dropped down almost to the - 10, but even just 3" > down the soil will remain an AVERAGE of all the temperatures of the past > week - say ~ 15. So the underlying roof won't "see" those short-term > overnight drops. Likewise, in summer, if you have two or three blazing > days of + 105 F., under even three inches of dirt your roof will never > "see" it, instead remaining the several week day/night average of say ~ > 75 F.! > > Also the PLANT LIFE on top will reduce windchill and increase air film > insulation factors in winter and the shading and transpiration cooling it > provides will help in summer. > > So plants/dirt on top shield against short-term weather extremes, but to > prevent the slow penitration of outdoors summer heat or the slow escape of > indoors winter warmth, you want INSULATION, and at R-.2/inch, it's just > too expensive to suport the R-40 (almost 17 feet!) you would theoretically > need in some northern climates, > > I say "theoretically" because the soil's thermal flywheel effect is such > that it takes (in dry soil) about a month for heat to travel 18", so in 6 > months (9' of soil) your winter heat would be escaping but it wouldn't > matter because you'd enjoy that cooling 'cause it would be summer! They > use that principle in Australia (See AUSTRALIAN EARTH-COVERED BUILDING by > Baggs - Rog, have you seen that one?) to let summer sun arrive in winter > and winter cool arrive in summer, but it means holding up hellacious > amounts of dirt with "hell-fer-stout" concrete roofs and walls. They > should discover subsurface insulation as a way to hugely deminish those > loads. (As I've indicated before, I'm into minimizing concrete for > eco-reasons.) > > Bet that's more than you wanted to know about the thermal properties of > dirt, but because of the chronic insulation/moderation confusion about the > stuff, I thought maybe it needed to be said. If irrelevant to you, just > hit the delete button....Don -- Stephen H. Kapit DreamTime Newsletter http://www.dreamtime.net The DreamTime newsletter is spiritually based and focused on higher consciousness and new paradigm living. Predictions on investments and global events are also included.
|