Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob and CordwoodM J Epko duckchow at hotmail.comSun May 31 13:47:22 CDT 1998
I dropped in at Rob & Jaki Roy's the other day & spent a few hours. Rob had just returned from a research trip to England for his next book, which isn't about cordwood. Or cob. (Cob's been enjoying a recent spate of published materials, eh? Just like SB has. Look for another cob book in the fray in a year or so, this one from Ianto Evans, to be published by Chelsea Green. My recommendation, as always, is that people should get 'em all. We're talking about *houses* here - $80 or $100(US) on these books is darned cheap in the long run even for the most destitute of us: even if it's only one passing phrase in one of the books that prevents a life-threatening, or just plain annoying, situation. But then again, there didn't used to be any books about it, and there's a heckuva lotta really good old earthen structures in this world.) Anyway, we did talk a little bit about substituting cob for concrete in cordwood. There's a few concerns, but without knowing any of the specifics of a given project it's impossible to comment, really. Let me preface the notes of caution (not objection!) he raised by saying that he has indirect knowledge of a contemporary loadbearing cob-cordwood house in Wales that's evidently doing well. He doesn't know just when it was built, or how big it is, but understands that they simply substituted cob for the concrete, and used a typical insulative filling like the atypical one that Rob endorses. It wasn't double-wall. He's been told that the house is doing fine. Maybe somebody from Cob Cottage knows more, since there's some overlap-of-techniques going on. That said... in an infill capacity (in a post-and-beam frame), he sees no real problem with cob-cordwood. It ain't structural, so delving into the unknown in that instance without the benefit of tests or experience isn't very alarming. For loadbearing, the concerns were primarily that the cob isn't going to create the kind of stable matrix with-and-around the cordwood that concrete does, let alone be a cohesive whole. If all the wood in a cordwood wall rots out, the concrete will still hold up the roof; and that same stability is beneficial when it comes to uplift (might want to think about strapping the roof to the foundation for this project, even though it's not for habitation), and straight-line winds. Cob walls are stable because they're monolithic. Cob Cottage folks (and Shannon) have said in the past that using big boulders and hunks of wood in cob walls weaken them. (What about windows and doors, huh? Huh?... grin...) But I guess I see that point. With a cob-cordwood structure, assuming 18"-wide loadbearing walls (kinda big for this project), there'll be two 6"-wide (or so) bands of cob, maybe ranging from four to six inches thick... one band of cob-mortar on the in-side, and one out-side... and an insulative material (or airspace, not as good) in-between, all tied together with the log-ends, which are exposed on both sides. If the loads (live and dead) on the cob matrix exceed its ability to not crush, there will be settling as the cob crumbles. Given that this structure is a sauna (following Rob's basic principles of design and use in his book on the topic?), it's possible that the interior and exterior bands of cob-mortar may behave differently over time... weather-events notwithstanding. That all depends a lot on the batch of cob, though. Using cob-mortar all the way through, eliminating the core thermal break, would *possibly* make it more structurally stable, but would kill the thermal resistance (Rob uses Malcom Wells' pet phrase, "thermal nosebleed"), which would be an especially bad thing since we're talkin' sauna here. Um, that's all that's coming to what's left of my mind just now. Is Bekcy Bee doing your workshop, or is that a different-but-similar thing somewhere else? * Oh, regarding the bark-falling-off-as-the-tree-dries thing, it's my understanding that its species-dependant. Some kinds of trees are easier to debark green, and almost impossible afterward... while others do indeed shrink away from their skins when they die. * Say, Charmaine, the hard-copies of your catalog arrived at Earthwood... did you send one to TLS? If not, could you? HC66 Box 119, Hillsboro NM 88042 ... thanks... If you already did send one, I'll look it over when I get back there. * Please direct any responses to duckchow at mail2.greenbuilder.com and not the address this came from. I'm on the road (currently Annapolis, MD, staying at Sam's farm for a couple weeks, and ready for the Natural Building Colloquium East). I'll be back in three weeks or so, but am checking in on things when the opportunities come along. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|