Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob Re: COB CODESShannon C. Dealy dealy at deatech.comFri Oct 3 22:37:50 CDT 1997
On Mon, 29 Sep 1997 TonyBosMa at aol.com wrote: > Dear Cob Friends, > I am inspired by the revival of cob, for which you are mostly responsible > for. I bought your video and plan to take a class in the spring of 1998. I am > unsure, however, about the building codes for such homes. Me and my partner > see great potentional for us to really have a sacred home. We would like to > build on some land in Hawaii. I have not had any responses from the building > code authorities there. To your knowledge, is this an "unacceptable" type of > construction for homes in the U.S. ? > Thank You, > Anthony Olivieri Cob is not currently an approved building method under any of the standard building codes, so here are the methods (that I am aware of) which can and in at least some cases have been used to deal with the building code issues: 1 - Some areas of the U.S. do not use building codes, so people just build whatever they want. 2 - Some areas have what is known as an "owner/builder" clause in the code, which gives a great deal more latitude for people who are building a structure just for themselves. These "owner/builder" codes vary greatly, so you will need to check on your local options and requirements if this is available in your area. 3 - The building codes generally allow for experimental structures to be built at the discretion of your local building department, but most building departments are worried about liability if it falls down so this is usually not allowed, though it never hurts to check. 4 - In most cases, I believe that you can build pretty much anything you like if an Architectural Engineer will certify that the structure meets the code's structural, energy, fire, and safety requirements, but they may be required to back up their certification with test results from a national testing laboratory, and I would imagine that few Arch. Engineers would be willing to certify a structure without those laboratory results to use in their structural computations. 5 - In at least some (if not all) of the standard residential building codes, accessory buildings of up to around 120 square feet are allowed to be built without permits (unless they are wired, plumbed or have some other feature which would require a permit). I believe the theory here is that these small buildings are garden sheds or storage buildings, and that you are not allowed to live in them, though some people do. It may be (i.e. I don't know) that you could legally build a structure this size with all the amenities using cob, and only be required to get permits for the plumbing and wiring, but not the building structure. 6 - Agricultural buildings generally have much lower code standards, so some have been built as "agricultural buildings" though generally you are not supposed to live in these structures. 7 - Some people simply go renegade and build without approval, though in some areas they can and will make you tear the structure down if you get caught. Also, this method generally cannot be used if you wish to hook up to public utilities other than telephone, since the utility companies often have to get permits in order to make the connection to your building. The above is all that I can think of with regard to cob and the building code, it comes from a mixture of sources and I am not entirely certain of the accuracy of some parts of it. This should give you ideas of some approaches that may be available to you. You should be certain to check the actual building codes and laws for your area since I have heard several rumours of cases where a building official told someone that the local codes didn't allow building a certain structure, when in reality the official was either mistaken, misinformed, didn't want the structure built, or was just on a power trip. Shannon Dealy dealy at deatech.com
|